The Moralist

Morality is doing the right thing in the context of the social contract. We all live together, in varying degrees and due to our cooperation benefit from the collective. We also may have our lives deprecated because others in the society may act immorally. Deciding what is moral cannot necessarily be gleamed from ancient text or dogma. As our collective situation changes, so might our moral guidelines. And things are changing at a pace unknown in human history. That is why we must examine our moral standing with the same tools we use to discover the universe: Emprical evidence confirmed by rigorous analysis verified by peer review. That is the essence of this blog: Posing moral questions and coming to answers by the way of empirical reasoning. Discussion and comments are not only encouraged but demanaded of the reader.

Monday, August 25, 2014

The Real World (part II)




The Real World was getting too long, plus I can't put these cartoons in comments.  Love Kliban.  Anyway, as the Tao Te Ching teaches us:  The past and present are illusions, there is only the eternal, ever changing NOW.  As Billy Pilgrim teaches us:  There is good and bad, horrible and wonderful in life and to get through it, try to focus on the good parts.  Comparisons are useless as there will always people better and worse off than myself but those comparisons do not change my life, which I am trying to get through by thinking of and looking forward to the good parts, mostly.  I had the choice recently to replace the dreaded '97 Saturn and was at the brink of buying a Mustang convertible, but ended up with a CX5.  Practical, and out of this world great to a 16 year old Sudanese, but a meaningless comparison.  Can't afford the down on solar, even though the payback is ten years, solar panels are still very inefficient and use manufacturing processes that do as much harm as good.  Have to keep the Jacuzzi going because the wife has a bad back (reminding me to check on the tax ramifications).  Burn wood in the fireplace and with our internal thermostats set low hardly heat the house during the winter but for the same reason use a lot of electricity in the summer to keep ourselves somewhat cool.  


2022 will release me from having to procure the seven deadly sins (see below).  I plan to let my spirit (what is left of it) soar.  I will stay legal, but not necessarily moral.  That is, of course dependent on my physical and financial well-being until the aforementioned day of liberation.  I'm sure the effects will be mostly localized to whatever hamlet finds its misfortune to have me as an inhabitant.  

“The seven deadly sins... food, clothing, firing, rent, taxes,respectability and children. Nothing can lift those seven millstones from man's neck but money; and the spirit cannot soar until the millstones are lifted.”
-Shaw

2 comments:

  1. First off, any small pig would be honored to have you as a neighbor. Secondly, Kliban does seem like another rare but wonderfully special smart-ass.
    As far as comparisons go, I must compare your thoughts to the lyrics of La bamba—it all sounds good but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Furthermore, as you have pointed out, we live in a collective. That means we are obligated to know of life's benevolence and kindness as intimately as its greed and evil. We must know the failings, frailties, strengths and compassions of all humans—from individuals to small groups and societies. Most importantly, we must know our place in the melee. And to define ourselves holistically we must compare all that we are to all that was, all that is and all that is possible.
    Yes, we are always traveling at the speed of self-preservation and desire, but we must always temper our individual movement with the acceleration of humility. We must act upon individual self-interest only after it has been filtered through the sieve of life-humbled morality.
    As a final note, I don't quite understand your suggestion that you will "not necessarily" stay moral. Is morality a choice only for those who see themselves as unbound by societal rules and restrictions? Is it ever okay to choose immorality simply because of one's circumstance? If so, I must declare mistrial and admonish the jury for their asininity.

    ReplyDelete