The rule of law and the law of morality were at one time the
same concept. This is no longer the case as we see law and morality as
distinct, yet complimentary entities. The majority of activities considered
immoral at this time are also illegal. Morality has become the rules beyond the
scope of law. A person who seeks to live morally is exceeding the minimum
standards for behavior set by the law. It is quite possible for someone to be
well within the law at the same time behaving in an immoral manner. We have
decided to live in a collective where value is determined monetarily. In this context, businesses act immorally by
lying, deceiving, and otherwise acting predatorily to make money. This is viewed as moral unless it is evidentially
outside of the law. While the law tends
to focus on the extent of Human interaction that can be quantitatively defined,
morality seeks to regulate actions and thoughts that arise from subjective
Human values. Morality is subjective but it is necessarily also
quantifiable. Morality changes as our
social conditions change but it must be intellectually sound. It arises out of
a particular set of circumstances. Once removed from that particular set of
circumstances it may or may not be relevant. If I were to murder an enemy of
mine in the context of a normal social setting, I would certainly be sent to
prison for most of my life or even executed. If, however, I were a member of
the United States Marines and engaged in combat, I could slaughter as many
Human Beings as I liked on the battlefield. This would not result in my
imprisonment but rather would be viewed as an act of great benefit to society.
Moral issues are hotly debated because there are no absolute answers. Each
issue must be dealt with both individually and with a clear idea of the
circumstances involved. The law as it is written implies not only standards for
behaviors, but also the conditions under which the law is applicable. That is
why there are thousands of laws trying to cover the multitudinous aspects of
the Human condition. It is also the reason for loopholes that allow the law to
be circumvented under unusual circumstances. Morality changes with the times.
Many of the standards of moral behavior thirty years ago are not applicable at
this time.
Morality is doing the right thing in the context of the social contract. Deciding what is moral cannot necessarily be gleamed from ancient text or dogma. Things are changing at a pace unknown in human history. That is why we must examine our moral standing with the same tools we use to discover the universe: Emprical evidence confirmed by rigorous analysis verified by peer review. Discussion and comments are not only encouraged but demanaded of the reader.
The Moralist
Morality is doing the right thing in the context of the social contract. We all live together, in varying degrees and due to our cooperation benefit from the collective. We also may have our lives deprecated because others in the society may act immorally. Deciding what is moral cannot necessarily be gleamed from ancient text or dogma. As our collective situation changes, so might our moral guidelines. And things are changing at a pace unknown in human history. That is why we must examine our moral standing with the same tools we use to discover the universe: Emprical evidence confirmed by rigorous analysis verified by peer review. That is the essence of this blog: Posing moral questions and coming to answers by the way of empirical reasoning. Discussion and comments are not only encouraged but demanaded of the reader.
No comments:
Post a Comment